Expect the government to create a violent conflict!

I believe we can expect the government to try and create a situation to force the hand of some patriots, into a violent confrontation in which the government can Utilize it for propaganda. So far none of the recent mass shootings have fulfilled their hopes or needs, they have been perpetrated by someone on the left or a muslim.

They have not been able to create the propaganda needed to paint the Tea Party or other conservative groups as violent or as extremists. Even with the main stream media outright lying to assist them, they have nothing believable or substantial enough to garner public support for their radical agenda. Even people that share the same conservative values as the Tea Party and similar groups, could be turned against those groups if people believe them to be violent.

With to few Americans understanding the true nature and danger of where our society is currently at, they could be easily swayed into believing untruths if violence is involved. That is because many people, are going about their daily lives, paying no attention to anything but major events (i’ll keep my opinion of these people to myself). Still believing that the government has their best interests in mind. It takes something out of the ordinary to get their attention, who controls the flow of information or propaganda will win the day.

That is why I believe the government will make another attempt at the Bundy Ranch, it is a situation they believe they can turn around, if they do it quickly before the situation can get back into the courts where they make get handed a defeat because of the change in perception. I believe that this is where they think they can create a violent conflict more easily then starting over someplace else. We must be ever watchful of agents of the government worming their way in and creating emotions that can only hurt us, and the cause of patriotism.

Sorry

I am sorry I have not been able to post anything recently, my back went out again, and i’m down. I can’t sit for any time in the computer chair, but will try and get back to posting. Most of what I was sharing I was getting from other sites, look around and you can find the info you want, sorry once again.

Breaking: Bureau of Land Management Won’t Enforce Court Order Against Bundy Cows

From The PJ Tatler (pjmedia.com)

Breaking: Bureau of Land Management Won’t Enforce Court Order Against Bundy Cows
http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2014/04/12/breaking-bureau-of-land-management-wont-enforce-court-order-against-bundy-cows/

Posted under the news article tab also.

Federal Agency Vows to Continue legal Action

From Fox News.com

Federal Agency Vows to Continue legal Action after ending Nevada ranch Stand-off

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/04/13/federal-agency-pulls-back-in-nevada-ranch-standoff-but-legal-fight-remains/?intcmp=latestnews

Posted under the news article tab also.

Some News Coverage From Breitbart

Here are a few articles posted on Breitbart

Bundy Ranch

The Saga of Bundy Ranch
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/04/12/The-Saga-of-Bundy-Ranch

Feds Blink-Leave ranch
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/04/12/Feds-Blink-Leave-Bundy-Ranch-Area

Feds Retreat From Armed Stand-off
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/04/12/Breaking-Images-from-Interstate-16-Standoff-Near-Bundy-Ranch

Posted under the news article tab also.

Why The Other Ranchers Support Cliven Bundy

A statement from Kena Lytle Gloeckner- a fellow rancher from Nevada.

There have been a lot of people criticizing Clive Bundy because he did not pay his grazing fees for 20 years. The public is also probably wondering why so many other cowboys are supporting Mr. Bundy even though they paid their fees and Clive did not. What you people probably do not realize is that on every rancher’s grazing permit it says the following: “You are authorized to make grazing use of the lands, under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management and covered by this grazing permit, upon your acceptance of the terms and conditions of this grazing permit and payment of grazing fees when due.” The “mandatory” terms and conditions go on to list the allotment, the number and kind of livestock to be grazed, when the permit begins and ends, the number of active or suspended AUMs (animal units per month), etc. The terms and conditions also list specific requirements such as where salt or mineral supplements can be located, maximum allowable use of forage levels (40% of annual growth), etc., and include a lot more stringent policies that must be adhered to. Every rancher must sign this “contract” agreeing to abide by the TERMS AND CONDITIONS before he or she can make payment. In the early 90s, the BLM went on a frenzy and drastically cut almost every rancher’s permit because of this desert tortoise issue, even though all of us ranchers knew that cow and desert tortoise had co-existed for a hundred+ years. As an example, a family friend had his permit cut by 90%. For those of you who are non ranchers, that would be equated to getting your paycheck cut 90%. In 1976 there were approximately 52 ranching permittees in this area of Nevada. Presently, there are 3. Most of these people lost their livelihoods because of the actions of the BLM. Clive Bundy was one of these people who received extremely unfair and unreasonable TERMS AND CONDITIONS. Keep in mind that Mr. Bundy was required to sign this contract before he was allowed to pay. Had Clive signed on the dotted line, he would have, in essence, signed his very livelihood away. And so Mr. Bundy took a stand, not only for himself, but for all of us. He refused to be destroyed by a tyrannical federal entity and to have his American liberties and freedoms taken away. Also keep in mind that all ranchers financially paid dearly for the forage rights those permits allow – – not rights to the land, but rights to use the forage that grows on that land. Many of these AUMS are water based, meaning that the rancher also has a vested right (state owned, not federal) to the waters that adjoin the lands and allow the livestock to drink. These water rights were also purchased at a great price. If a rancher cannot show beneficial use of the water (he must have the appropriate number of livestock that drinks and uses that water), then he loses that water right. Usually water rights and forage rights go hand in hand. Contrary to what the BLM is telling you, they NEVER compensate a rancher for the AUMs they take away. Most times, they tell ranchers that their AUMS are “suspended,” but not removed. Unfortunately, my family has thousands of “suspended” AUMs that will probably never be returned. And so, even though these ranchers throughout the course of a hundred years invested thousands(and perhaps millions) of dollars and sacrificed along the way to obtain these rights through purchase from others, at a whim the government can take everything away with the stroke of a pen. This is the very thing that Clive Bundy single-handedly took a stand against. Thank you, Clive, from a rancher who considers you a hero.